More in-depth film festival coverage than any other website!
Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  HBS Radio Contests About 
Advertisement

Overall Rating
4.15

Awesome58.33%
Worth A Look: 18.33%
Average: 10%
Pretty Bad: 6.67%
Total Crap: 6.67%

3 reviews, 42 user ratings


Latest Reviews

Monterey Pop by Rob Gonsalves

Mutant Swinger from Mars by Jay Seaver

Hellraiser by Charles Tatum

Most Dangerous Man in America, The: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers by Lybarger

Frozen by Jay Seaver

Crazy Heart by Rob Gonsalves

Quigley by Rob Gonsalves

From Paris with Love by brianorndorf

Secret of Kells, The by brianorndorf

Dear John by brianorndorf

subscribe to this feed


Rosemary's Baby
cover
List Price:   $9.98
Price:   $9.49
find out more information
[AllPosters.com] Buy posters from this movie
by Dancing Potato

"The classic psychological thriller. Many will try, few will top it."
5 stars

Dude, I need to see a scary movie for Halloween. Rosemary's Baby? What the hell is that? Oh cool, like that movie where the little kid is possessed, and then everyone dies? What?! So, you say no people die, there's no blood and no stabbings? So how is this scary?

Movie titles are made in image of the movie. Therefore, before seeing Jaws, you assume it’s a thriller (I’m thinking you picked it up in the Thriller section of your video store) about someone or something with a massive pair of jaws (that is, if you’re a complete idiot and have never heard of this movie, and completely disregard the gigantic shark on the video jacket). Therefore, one could assume that a thriller called Rosemary’s Baby would be about a killer, satanical baby (much like the one in Dead Alive). So imagine the average teenager’s (or mildly immature adult’s) surprise when they see that the movie is not a slasher movie, that only one death appears on-screen (and even then…), and that the baby is never shown. Unthinkable!

Rosemary and Guy Woodhouse (Mia Farrow and John Cassavetes) are the typical young couple; they don’t have much money (he’s a struggling theatre actor) but they have life ahead of them. They buy an apartment in New York and move in next to the Castavets, a strange but seemingly harmless couple. Guy and Roman (Sidney Blackmer) really hit it off, but Rosemary is creeped out by Minnie (Ruth Gordon). Minnie is always after Rosemary, always talking to her and always butting in. One evening, as Guy and Rosemary are having a romantic dinner (which they both hope will end up in bed, so that they can become pregnant), Minnie drops off some chocolate mousse. Guy likes it, but Rosemary thinks it tastes like chalk, so she chows down half of it and disposes of the rest. What ensues is a very disturbing scene in which Satan rapes Rosemary on a yacht. Soon enough, Rosemary is impregnated. As can be guessed after being raped by the devil, that kid won’t be right. Rosemary begins to suspect that her entourage is to blame for this.

Rosemary’s Baby is one of those thrillers that show absolutely nothing. I’m sure a lot of people (that I probably know in some form) are groaning. “We want stabbings!” you say. I’d be lying if I said that Rosemary’s Baby wasn’t scary, because it is. Somewhere, someone has decided to associate fear with violence (I’d blame Hitchcock, but his movies are too good to be blamed) and now modern society is paying the price with stuff like Dracula 2000 and Urban Legend. Violence can be scary if done right, but I’ve come to believe that movies who make us imagine the terror are much better (Blair Witch nonwithstanding). So indeed, Rosemary’s Baby is scary. You won’t jump out of your seat (except perhaps in the scene where Ruth Gordon comes very, very close to having a nude scene…yech!) but the film has the quality of creeping under your skin and playing ping-pong with your brain. The music is typical late 60’s stuff. It most sounds like someone throwing marbles in a soup can, but in most scenes it actually works very well, coordinating with the performances.
The movie is filmed almost exclusively in close-ups or cramped corners. In some films this proves to be distracting, but Rosemary’s Baby has a way of disguising this so that it isn’t blindingly obvious. Polanski’s movies are almost exclusively thrillers/horror (with The Fearless Vampire Killers being a notable exception) and are generally filmed in the same way. This is no exception.

Speaking of Polanski, I couldn’t help but be disturbed by this movie’s relation with his personal life. A scant year after the movie was released, Polanski’s wife, Sharon Tate (who appears unbilled in the movie, no less) was murdered in her Hollywood home by Satanic hippie Charles Manson. Tate was pregnant. There is no direct relation with this and the movie, but it just seems eerie to me. I mean, some of the first hypotheses (over a year before they found out the real motive of the crime, something about The Beatles) was that someone was indeed rewriting the movie in their own sick way. Tate’s stomach had been slashed open and the baby was exposed. Polanski later dedicated a movie, Tess, to his wife.

Mia Farrow is best known for being Woody Allen’s wife (and adoptive mother of Allen’s girlfriend… ugh) and for being hopelessly skinny. Farrow comes off very well as the suffering Rosemary. Her eyes alone express half of what she’s going through. John Cassavetes was probably a better director than actor, but he has given some incredible performances in his life. This is widely regarded as one of them, and I’d be hard-pressed to disagree if it wasn’t for the the last third of the movie. Technically, there’s nothing wrong with it. It’s just as tight and atmospheric as the rest of the film, except Cassavetes is a huge prick. He’s a huge, annoying prick and I wanted to poke his eyes out. I guess that’s a good thing. Ruth Gordon (Maude from Harold & Maude) is delightful in her Oscar-winning role. Gordon was as underrated an actress as she could possibly have been. Here she comes off as likeable but annoying but as always she is a delight to watch. Sidney Blackmer is pretty good in a role that required him to have piercing eyes. Honestly I don’t see much of his piercing eyes but Blackmer is good nonetheless. If you’re a cameo spotter look for Charles Grodin as Dr. Hill, Sharon Tate as one of Rosemary’s friends, cigar-chomping B-movie mogul William Castle as the guy who waits outside the phone booth and Tony Curtis as a voice on the phone.

Rosemary’s Baby is psychological horror and in the end it comes down to “you like it or you don’t”. I liked it. A lot. I can’t guarantee you will (if you enjoyed Prom Night II on anything but a b-movie level, you won’t) but it costs nothing (or about a buck, if you rent it) to try.

It's been 33 years, and no one has topped it. I mean, come on: The Astronaut's Wife, The Devil's Advocate... hardly A-list material. Classic.

 del.icio.us    
link directly to this review at http://efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=2408&reviewer=281
originally posted: 10/27/01 10:40:14
[printer] printer-friendly format  
OFFICIAL SELECTION: 2008 Florida Film Festival For more in the 2008 Florida Film Festival series, click here.

User Comments

1/06/10 art I STAND CORRECTED! FOLK"S!,THE OMEN WAS MUCH MORE EXCITING than this BORE! 1 stars
11/12/09 art THE DEFINITIVE film about a devil child! 3 stars
3/08/08 Pamela White not scary but suspenseful 4 stars
5/26/07 Kimberly Dull Amazing and truly scary. Love this movie. 4 stars
3/24/07 MP Bartley More a slow burning paranoid drama than a horror, but the last 20 minutes is great. 4 stars
1/15/07 David Pollastrini didn't find it very scary. 3 stars
9/17/06 gebhard this is true horror: no special effects, no blood - but it scares the hell out of you 5 stars
8/10/06 Dragon The Artist Well below B-grade, Satan is too lazy&arrogant to f%*#k a wimpy mortal to spawn. 1 stars
7/26/05 malcolm the way suspense should be done. please never remake this! 5 stars
1/28/05 Monday Morning The feelgood movie of the '60s. The best. 5 stars
12/20/04 DM Brilliantly acted, superbly directed and just damn creepy. 5 stars
11/19/04 screb farrows great in it 5 stars
8/09/04 psycho dwarf Polanski's brainful of evil produces a wicked mindfvck. 5 stars
6/25/04 milehigh A wonderful psychological horror 4 stars
12/09/03 Samuel Either you like this movie or you don't! You who put just average should be slapped...HARD 5 stars
11/29/03 john brilliant and truly unsettling - a Polanski study in psychosis and horror 5 stars
10/14/03 Erik Van Sant Frightening and engaging. This is one of the greatest horror movies ever made. Hail Satan! 5 stars
10/12/03 Shaq Dudes, I haven't really ever heard of this movie BUT IT FUCKING OWNED! I SUCK COCKS! 5 stars
7/27/03 Nix Garthim Far to brilliant and psychological for todays gore addicted "horror" fans. Best REAL horror 5 stars
7/15/03 Momma Jo Hansonfoupherhanselgretle DUMBASS MOVIE!!!!!!! HAHAHA!!!! WHAT A FUCKING FAKE 'HORROR' MOVIE! HAHA! DIE! DIE ROSMARY! 1 stars
4/10/03 Icebar Rosenrath Freakay. Does take a while to build interest, but once it does it pays off in numerous ways 5 stars
3/27/03 Ionicera great tense thriller with unexpected darkly comic ending 5 stars
1/30/03 Christi Nash so out of date and steeped in ignorant mythology that it doesn't frighten modern viewers 3 stars
1/30/03 Shazad Less is more! Polanski is tha' bomb!! 5 stars
1/23/03 Amanda Brown I didn't like the movie because they should have shown you the baby 2 stars
11/16/02 cyco it's written by ira levin baby! 5 stars
10/21/02 Charles Tatum Very cool, very creepy 5 stars
9/26/02 Monster W. Kung Annoying. Interesting premise, but far too slow and doesn't deliver enough in the end. 3 stars
5/25/02 Butterbean I guess that back in 1960 B.C. this would be considered to be scary and suspenseful. 3 stars
4/27/02 R.W. Welch A professional piece of work, but too far-fetched to really get into. 3 stars
3/17/02 Lady Leviathan I simply adore Roman Castevet. He's wonderful. 5 stars
2/20/02 Xaver Very dated, but some fun stuff in it. Ruth Gordon was a gem. 4 stars
12/09/01 canoecarrier Another of many masterpieces by Polanski. 5 stars
11/14/01 Zizzerzazzerzuzz What the hell is supposed to be frightening about this movie? I musta blinked & missed it. 1 stars
10/19/01 Andrew Carden Way Too Over The Top, and Basically Total Confusing and Extremly Boreness Throughout. 2 stars
7/31/01 Matthew Bartley Oh it's so dull apart from...WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO HIS EYES?!?!?! 2 stars
4/09/01 Girl 9 Overrated! This film is VERY dated, more funny than scary..... 2 stars
3/16/01 GeorgE McCaul great direction by Polanski, and Farrow is incredible in the final scene. 5 stars
11/17/00 Sikamikaniko Simply Exquisit! Nothing happens, yet you´re sitting on needles all the way! 5 stars
11/01/00 Monday Morning This movie is uniformly excellent in every way. 5 stars
4/04/00 Robin Haines Gives you an old-fashioned case of the "willies" 5 stars
3/18/00 ciro scardina my favorite movie 5 stars
IF YOU'VE SEEN THIS FILM, RATE IT!
Note: Duplicate, 'planted,' or other obviously improper comments
will be deleted at our discretion. So don't bother posting 'em. Thanks!
Your Name:
Your Comments:
Your Location: (state/province/country)
Your Rating:


Discuss this movie in our forum

USA
  12-Jun-1968

UK
  N/A

Australia
  N/A



Advertisement


Home Reviews  Articles  Release Dates Coming Soon  DVD  Top 20s Criticwatch  Search
Public Forums  Festival Coverage  HBS Radio Contests About 
eFilmCritic.com: Australia's Largest Movie Review Database.
Privacy Policy | HBS Inc. | |   

All data and site design copyright 1997-2010, HBS Entertainment, Inc.
Search for
reviews features movie title writer/director/cast